Urban 30 km/h in Europe: where should we pilot it next in 2026?

#road-safety #vision-zero #speed-limits #urban-mobility #europe #data #enforcement

Creato da Marino Tilatti

1 Moderatore
Marino avatar

Testo della proposta

Ecco la questione che vogliamo affrontare insieme: clicca su ogni paragrafo per aggiungere il tuo contributo votabile

Context

Across Europe, city leaders are revisiting urban speed limits as a practical way to reduce deaths and serious injuries—especially for vulnerable road users. In February 2026, the European Commission published a mid-point progress report on the EU Road Safety Policy Framework (2021–2030), noting that current progress is not fast enough to hit the 2030 targets. The same policy package highlights urban measures such as 30 km/h as high-impact actions for safety.

This proposal is international by design: it helps a community or city network choose how to run a 30 km/h pilot (enforcement-first, infrastructure-first, or data-led phased rollout), and which specific corridors or districts should be prioritised. Because locations are part of the decision, the options use map-ready coordinates to make comparisons concrete.

What we need to decide

  • Which implementation approach we should adopt for a 12-month pilot
  • Which cities/corridors should be the first candidates for the pilot
  • Which success metrics must be reported publicly (speed compliance, injuries, perception)

How to participate

Rank the implementation approaches. Then select all priority pilot locations you support (multi-select). In comments: suggest additional candidate corridors, and propose the minimum “public dashboard” indicators you want to see each month.

Opzioni di voto

Vota le diverse opzioni proposte per trovare insieme la soluzione migliore.

0 Ancora nessun voto
0 Ancora nessun voto
0 Ancora nessun voto
0 Ancora nessun voto

0
0
0

A — Enforcement-first + transparent monthly dashboard

What it includes

Start with clear signage, targeted enforcement, and a public monthly dashboard: speed compliance, injuries/near-miss hotspots, and compliance by street type. Add quick fixes (paint, signage, crossing visibility) where data shows persistent non-compliance.

Why this approach

Fastest path to measurable outcomes, with rapid iteration based on evidence.

Da 1 Apr 2026
a 31 Mar 2027
0 Ancora nessun voto
0
0
0

B — Infrastructure-first (traffic calming where it matters most)

What it includes

Prioritise physical changes on the most dangerous corridors: raised crossings, narrowed lanes, protected cycle space, safer junction design, and school-zone treatments. Enforcement complements design, but the street geometry does the heavy lifting.

Why this approach

Infrastructure can deliver lasting compliance and safety benefits beyond signage.

Da 1 May 2026
a 30 Apr 2027
0 Ancora nessun voto
0
0
0

C — Phased pilot: measure → adjust → expand

What it includes

Start with a limited pilot area, publish baseline measurements (speed distribution, collision history, perceptions), apply a mix of enforcement and low-cost infrastructure, then expand only after a 6-month review.

Why this approach

Reduces conflict and improves legitimacy through clear before/after evidence.

Da 1 Apr 2026
a 30 Sep 2026
0 Ancora nessun voto

Fonti

Commenti