Barcelona tourism tax 2026: pick priority areas and a spending plan

Proposal from group Concorder Civic Lab
1 Moderator
Marino avatar

Proposal text

Here's the matter we want to address together: click on each paragraph to add your votable contribution

Context

Barcelona’s tourism tax is rising sharply from 1 April 2026, and public debate is already split. Some residents want the extra money to visibly relieve pressure on housing and daily services. Parts of the tourism industry argue the increase is too steep and should have been phased in. Whatever position someone takes on the tax itself, the next question is unavoidable: where should the additional revenue go first, and in which parts of the city should people feel it?

This proposal makes that choice explicit. It asks residents to rank spending approaches and to choose priority zones where interventions should be concentrated in 2026, rather than spreading funds too thinly to be noticed.

What is being decided

  • A ranked spending approach for the additional tourism tax revenue
  • The specific areas where the city should prioritize action in 2026

Comments are welcome, especially if you can point to daily pain points: overcrowded streets, waste, noise at night, or housing stress signals.

Voting options

Vote on the different proposed options to find the best solution together.

0
0
0

Make housing the headline, with a few clear projects people can track

What it looks like

Concentrate funding on a small set of housing actions that can be reported clearly: acquisition and rehabilitation of units, targeted rent-support programs, and enforcement capacity tied to housing pressure.

Why it appeals

It turns “tourism contributes to housing” into something residents can see and measure.

0 No votes yet
👍1 pro👎1 contro
Marino avatar
Pro icon
Directly addresses housing stress, which is central to the current debate around tourism pressure.
Marino avatar
Cons icon
Housing outcomes are slower; without strong reporting, people may feel nothing changed.
0
0
0

Fix the daily friction first in the most overloaded streets

What it looks like

Fund visible service improvements where tourism pressure is highest: cleaning, waste, public toilets, crowd management, and targeted mobility measures, with service standards that are actually enforced.

Why it appeals

Residents notice it quickly, especially in peak season.

0 No votes yet
👍1 pro👎1 contro
Marino avatar
Pro icon
Creates faster, tangible benefits for residents who live near high-traffic corridors.
Marino avatar
Cons icon
If housing is not meaningfully funded, it can feel like treating symptoms only.
0
0
0

Split the money, but lock the rules so it can’t drift

What it looks like

Protect a defined housing share, then fund a smaller set of tourism-management projects with measurable targets, and publish a short quarterly update. Keep the plan tight to avoid “everything gets a little” spending.

Why it appeals

It aims for balance without turning into vague promotion spending.

0 No votes yet
👍1 pro👎1 contro
Marino avatar
Pro icon
Balances housing and operational pressure while keeping the plan reviewable.
Marino avatar
Cons icon
More complicated to communicate, and complexity can weaken accountability.

0 No votes yet
0 No votes yet
0 No votes yet
0 No votes yet

Sources

  • Reuters

    Explains the tax increase, the April 2026 timing, and the stated housing allocation share, plus reactions.

  • El País

    Details the new levels and how Barcelona’s total per-night amount can reach higher levels with the municipal surcharge.

  • Skift

    Travel industry context on the doubled hotel tax beginning in April and potential implications for visitors.

Comments