In 2026 we want to formalise a hybrid work policy that reduces ambiguity (who is onsite, when, and for what) while improving collaboration without losing flexibility. Common friction points include poorly planned hybrid meetings, “empty office days,” and perceived fairness differences between roles.
The right model depends on how work gets done: some functions benefit more from in-person time (onboarding, complex reviews, customer-facing sessions), while others can operate more remotely. To demonstrate Concorder’s mixed-option flexibility, each model includes an explicit pilot date range, optional attachments (policy references), and pros/cons to capture operational trade-offs.
Rank the hybrid models. Then select all non-negotiable principles you want in the policy. In comments: share constraints (time zones, customer schedules) and propose 2–3 simple KPIs (onboarding time, perceived productivity, meeting effectiveness).
Define presence expectations by role/function (e.g., lab/customer-facing/onboarding-heavy roles more onsite). Publish transparent criteria and rotation options to support fairness.
Test sustainability and fairness perception across roles.
No fixed days; people come in for “moments that benefit”: workshops, kick-offs, training, and complex reviews. Define an activity catalogue and planning rules to avoid last-minute chaos.
Increase meeting quality and reduce “unproductive office days.”
Each team agrees on 2 “core” onsite days aligned across dependencies; the rest stays flexible. Use onsite time for high-value rituals: planning, retros, onboarding, and major reviews.
Improve collaboration speed and reduce decision latency.
Step-by-step guide for defining rules and best practices for hybrid work (Italian version).
