Marino

Context: turning genAI experimentation into accountable practice

Many teams already use generative AI for drafting, summarizing, research assistance, and code suggestions. The challenge is that informal adoption can outpace governance: inconsistent rules, unclear accountability, and uneven training. A short, structured offsite can accelerate alignment—especially if it produces a practical policy, a training plan, and a clear list of approved tools and approved use cases.

This proposal schedules a focused internal offsite to finalize and launch the company’s generative AI policy. The program should cover: safe use expectations, prohibited data categories, human review requirements, escalation for high-risk use cases, and an implementation timeline for logging/auditability in business-critical workflows. The content is designed to align with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework and the NIST Generative AI Profile, which emphasize structured risk management across th

The vote is split into two functional decisions (dates and location) so people can signal multiple workable options. After voting, leadership can select the best-supported combination and proceed with booking and calendar holds.

Dates: select the offsite date range that works.

Location: select the venue that best supports an intensive working session.

Use comments to propose agenda topics and flag any compliance constraints that should shape the final policy.

Public proposals about ai governance

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged ai governance

Company AI offsite: set dates and location for policy rollout