Marino

Context: a renewed Canadian debate, with a global backdrop

In early March 2026, Canada’s discussion about online harms and child exploitation re-ignited after Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada should have an open debate about a possible social media ban for children as part of upcoming online harms legislation. Carney did not commit to a ban, saying there are arguments on both sides, but argued Canada is “lagging” on legislation related to online harms and the exploitation of children. Reporting also noted that earlier online harms legislation intr

This Canadian debate is happening while multiple countries consider (or implement) age limits for social media. Commentary and policy tracking highlight the central trade-off: supporters frame age limits as child-safety protections, while critics warn that bans can be technically porous, may push teens toward less-regulated corners of the internet, and often rely on intrusive age-assurance systems that create privacy and surveillance risks.

Direction: Should Canada pursue a child social media ban, an “age of majority” threshold, or a non-ban approach within an Online Harms Bill?

Package: If Ottawa brings back online harms legislation, which child-safety obligations on platforms should be emphasized publicly?

Privacy line: How much age verification should be acceptable, given concerns that strict age-gating can drive data collection and surveillance?

This proposal is designed to “ride the news” responsibly: the vote options and the pro/cons are limited to what is described in the sources below. Use comments to add additional reporting, explain enforceability concerns, and propose safeguards—always citing sources.

Canada online harms bill: should Ottawa ban social media for kids?

Context: a high-profile Commons vote and an unresolved policy choice

In early March 2026, the UK’s debate over a potential social media ban for under-16s surged after MPs voted down a proposed ban amendment linked to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. The issue remains live: supporters argue a ban is needed to reduce online harms for children, while opponents (including some child-safety voices) warn a blanket ban could push young people into less regulated online spaces.

Coverage of the vote also highlighted that, even without an outright ban, ministers may pursue a different route: stronger powers and a consultation-led approach that could introduce age restrictions, measures aimed at VPN use, and regulation of so-called addictive product features (for example autoplay). This proposal mirrors that public debate and asks your community to choose a direction that is both politically realistic and focused on child safety.

Big decision: Should the UK pursue an Australia-style under-16 ban, or a narrower framework built around age restrictions and feature-level controls?

Policy package: If the UK avoids a blanket ban, which specific measures should be prioritized (age restrictions, VPN-related steps, addictive feature rules)?

Timing and process: Should action be immediate (legislation now) or staged through consultation and subsequent regulation?

Vote on the overall direction, then select the measures you think should be on the government’s shortlist. Use comments to cite additional reporting, explain trade-offs, and suggest safeguards (privacy, enforceability, unintended consequences) consistent with the public debate described in the sources.

Public proposals about children

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged children

Canada online harms bill: should Ottawa ban social media for kids?

UK under-16 social media ban debate: what should happen next?