Marino

Our elevator is becoming a recurring problem: small failures are more frequent, downtime is harder to predict, and the user experience is drifting away from what residents consider acceptable, especially for older residents and families with strollers. We have two competing risks. If we postpone too long, we risk a major breakdown that forces an emergency decision at a worse price. If we overreact, we may commit to an expensive scope that goes beyond what the building truly needs.

This proposal frames the decision as a choice between three realistic modernization packages. Each package comes with a different work window, because timing is not a detail here: it changes disruption, temporary accessibility measures, and contractor availability. The goal is to approve a direction and a timetable that the administrator can translate into contracts and resident communications.

The modernization scope (from targeted upgrade to full replacement)

The execution window (works timing is part of the choice)

The resident protections and service guarantees that should be written into the contract

Reliability and long-term maintenance cost

Downtime risk during works and the need for temporary support

Warranty strength and spare-parts availability

Noise, dust, and daily building logistics

Vote on the package you find most reasonable, then choose the protections that matter most to you. Comments are especially useful if you have constraints such as medical needs, mobility issues, or specific periods when downtime would be particularly difficult.

Elevator modernization: choose a works plan and timetable

After heavy rain, our basement and storage areas have shown signs of water intrusion. Sometimes it’s minor dampness, sometimes it’s standing water near the lowest points. Even when damage looks small, it can create mold risk, ruin stored items, and shorten the life of electrical and mechanical systems. The question is how far we want to go now, and how much we want to rely on “wait and patch” versus a more durable fix.

There are a few realistic pathways. One is to manage water actively with pumps and sensors. Another is to improve drainage and backflow protection so water is less likely to enter in the first place. The most extensive path is full waterproofing of vulnerable walls and joints, often the most disruptive but also the most definitive.

We are choosing an investment approach for flood risk reduction, including indicative budgets, and also agreeing on how costs and responsibilities should be handled. This proposal intentionally separates “what we do” from “how we govern it”, because a technically good solution can still fail if maintenance and accountability are unclear.

How quickly we can reduce risk before the next intense rainfall

Long-term reliability and maintenance burden

Disruption during works and access limitations

Insurance implications and documentation for claims

Comments are useful here, especially if you’ve observed where water enters, when it happens, and whether it correlates with specific drains or courtyard areas.

Public proposals about condominium

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged condominium

Elevator modernization: choose a works plan and timetable

Basement flood risk: sump pump, drainage upgrades, or full waterproofing?