Marino

Our annual assembly matters for two reasons. First, it’s where we reset shared priorities and make governance decisions in public, not in side conversations. Second, it’s the moment we can turn member energy into concrete work by approving a small set of funded projects that volunteers can actually deliver.

This proposal bundles the assembly logistics with a lightweight participatory budget. That combination is intentional: it shows how Concorder can handle real governance and real action in one place. The meeting date and venue affect attendance and accessibility, so they are treated as real choices. The project funding decision uses a clear approval-style approach so the association can see what is widely supported and what needs rework.

The venue that best supports accessibility and discussion

Which two member-led projects should receive funding first

Total available: €18,000. The intention is to fund two projects that can start within weeks of the assembly and report progress publicly.

Vote on the date and venue options, then evaluate the projects. Use comments to suggest sharper scopes, partnerships, or volunteer capacity constraints that the board should factor in.

Annual assembly 2026: set the meeting and fund two projects

Most associations don’t fail because they lack ideas. They fail because a small number of people carry too much, for too long, and eventually disappear. When that happens, the rest of the group loses momentum, new volunteers hesitate to step in, and the work that once felt meaningful starts to feel heavy.

A “volunteer wellbeing policy” sounds formal, but the goal is simple: protect energy, set expectations, and make it easier for more people to contribute without burning out. This proposal asks us to adopt a lightweight set of norms we can actually follow, not a document that sits in a folder.

We will choose a policy package, and then decide how we want to handle workload visibility and handoffs. The outcome should be practical: something the board and project leads can apply immediately.

Too much work hidden in private chats or in one person’s head

Projects without clear owners, timelines, or end points

New volunteers not knowing where to start

Comments are important here. If you’ve felt overloaded, or you’ve hesitated to volunteer because you feared it would never end, say so. That’s the signal we need to design a healthier culture.

Volunteer wellbeing: adopt a simple policy that prevents burnout

The association will hold its 2026 Annual General Meeting (AGM) to present results and accounts, elect committee members, and approve any bylaw changes. Clear meeting rules and good minutes reduce disputes, improve participation, and make transitions smoother for volunteers.

This proposal is a Concorder showcase: we rank the election method and transparency package, then we choose date/time windows to maximize attendance, and finally we choose venue options where accessibility and travel time matter.

Which election/record-keeping approach we adopt

Which venue is most accessible and appropriate

Rank the governance options, then pick the date/time windows and venues you can attend. In comments: propose agenda items, candidate nominations (with short bios), and any accessibility requirements.

AGM 2026: election method, minutes, and meeting plan

L’associazione deve rinnovare il Consiglio Direttivo nel 2026. Oltre ai nomi, è importante definire un processo chiaro: metodo di voto (scheda unica o preferenze), gestione candidature, trasparenza del verbale e calendario dell’assemblea. Un processo ben progettato riduce contestazioni, aumenta partecipazione e rende più semplice il passaggio di consegne.

Questa proposta è “esemplare” per Concorder perché mostra: (1) opzioni con allegati (fac-simile verbale) per standardizzare la governance; (2) voto su date (range/time) per l’assemblea; (3) una scelta principale su “metodo” in ranking con pro/contro.

Metodo di voto e regole per candidature/trasparenza

Data e fascia oraria dell’assemblea elettiva

Documenti minimi da pubblicare prima e dopo il voto

Vota il metodo che approvi, seleziona le date compatibili e suggerisci nei commenti eventuali vincoli (sede, streaming, quorum, deleghe). Se hai proposte di candidatura, scrivi una mini-bio e le priorità che vorresti portare.

Associazione: elezione direttivo 2026, metodo di voto e calendario assemblea

Il progetto del Ponte sullo Stretto ha ottenuto approvazioni politiche e tecniche, mentre prosegue il contenzioso ambientale e la Corte dei Conti non ha registrato la delibera CIPESS. La decisione impatta collegamenti tra Sicilia e Calabria, risorse pubbliche e un territorio delicato.

Valutare se proseguire, rivedere o fermare l'opera, bilanciando benefici attesi (connessione stabile, occupazione) con criticità su costi, coperture e impatti ambientali.

Proseguire con il progetto attuale; rallentare per rivedere mitigazioni e sostenibilità; fermare e destinare risorse a traghetti, porti e ferrovia.

Iter aperto, atti contestati e territorio diviso: è il momento di incidere su scelte, controlli e alternative.

Vota la direzione e indica priorità su ambiente, finanza pubblica, qualità dei collegamenti e partecipazione locale.

Public proposals about governance

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged governance

Annual assembly 2026: set the meeting and fund two projects

Volunteer wellbeing: adopt a simple policy that prevents burnout

AGM 2026: election method, minutes, and meeting plan

Associazione: elezione direttivo 2026, metodo di voto e calendario assemblea

Ponte sullo Stretto di Messina: andare avanti, correggere la rotta o fermarsi?