Marino

London is preparing a six-month pilot where officers can use handheld facial recognition to verify identity during encounters. City Hall argues quick verification can prevent unnecessary arrests when someone can’t easily prove who they are. Critics argue it could normalize face scanning in everyday policing and widen the impact of stop-and-check, especially if oversight and reporting are weak.

People often talk past each other on this topic. Some want an outright pause. Others want a tightly limited pilot that either proves itself under strict scrutiny or stops. Another group wants expansion sooner. The details that matter most are concrete: where it can be used, when the public sees results, and what triggers a stop.

This proposal sets three linked choices. First, the overall stance on the pilot. Second, where it is allowed to operate. Third, when the first public review must happen, so governance is not pushed to the end after habits form.

London handheld facial recognition pilot: choose limits, places, and review dates

London is moving into a new phase of facial recognition in policing: a pilot where officers can use handheld tools to check faces against watchlists during interactions. Supporters say this could reduce wrongful arrests, speed up identity checks, and help find people who are wanted or missing. Critics warn it may normalize face scanning in public spaces, expand stop-and-search in practice, and deepen trust issues if oversight, accuracy, and safeguards are not strong enough.

The issue is not just “technology good or bad”. It’s about what is acceptable in day-to-day life, what rules constrain use, and who is accountable when mistakes happen. This proposal is a structured way to decide what London should ask for next: a pause, a tightly limited pilot, or a broader expansion tied to clear conditions.

First, the policy direction for operator-initiated facial recognition checks. Then, the guardrails London should insist on, regardless of direction. The goal is a decision that is understandable, enforceable, and reviewable over time.

When should face scanning be allowed, and when should it be off-limits?

What level of independent oversight is needed, and with what powers?

How should accuracy, bias, and error-handling be tested and reported?

What happens to data for non-matches, and how is that audited?

Use comments to suggest concrete limits, for example “only for violent crime watchlists”, “no use for low-level checks”, “public reporting every month”, or “independent approval before scaling”.

Public proposals about policing

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged policing

London handheld facial recognition pilot: choose limits, places, and review dates

London facial recognition checks: pause, pilot with limits, or expand?