Marino

Context: turning genAI experimentation into accountable practice

Many teams already use generative AI for drafting, summarizing, research assistance, and code suggestions. The challenge is that informal adoption can outpace governance: inconsistent rules, unclear accountability, and uneven training. A short, structured offsite can accelerate alignment—especially if it produces a practical policy, a training plan, and a clear list of approved tools and approved use cases.

This proposal schedules a focused internal offsite to finalize and launch the company’s generative AI policy. The program should cover: safe use expectations, prohibited data categories, human review requirements, escalation for high-risk use cases, and an implementation timeline for logging/auditability in business-critical workflows. The content is designed to align with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework and the NIST Generative AI Profile, which emphasize structured risk management across th

The vote is split into two functional decisions (dates and location) so people can signal multiple workable options. After voting, leadership can select the best-supported combination and proceed with booking and calendar holds.

Dates: select the offsite date range that works.

Location: select the venue that best supports an intensive working session.

Use comments to propose agenda topics and flag any compliance constraints that should shape the final policy.

Company AI offsite: set dates and location for policy rollout

Across the EU, the Digital Services Act (DSA) is reshaping how very large online platforms and search engines manage systemic risks, including risks linked to electoral processes and information integrity. In February 2026, the European Commission marked two years of DSA application (for most platforms since February 2024) and reiterated the shared enforcement model between national Digital Services Coordinators and the Commission for the largest services.

This proposal is designed for a cross-border civic coalition (NGOs, journalists, election observers, digital rights groups) that wants to coordinate a practical 2026 “election integrity playbook” aligned with the DSA’s risk-management logic: define what to monitor, how to escalate, what transparency to demand, and how to communicate findings responsibly.

Which coordination model to adopt (rapid monitoring, structured escalation, or transparency-first)

Which minimum evidence standards and safeguards we require

Options include attachments to authoritative references and date ranges because timing is explicitly part of the decision.

Public proposals about risk management

Search and filter proposals

Public proposals tagged risk management

Company AI offsite: set dates and location for policy rollout

DSA 2026: election integrity and platform risk responses in the EU